Sync speed good, throughput good but pings dire! Not that I`m much bothered, just wondered if anyone else has noticed? :)
Pinging www.idnet.co.uk [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=153ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=62
Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 124ms, Maximum = 153ms, Average = 138ms
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\wiggy>ping 212.69.36.10
Pinging 212.69.36.10 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=62
Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average
That`s better Rick ... my pings have never been tremendous though I might add ;)
Better now:
Pinging www.idnet.co.uk [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=62
Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 25ms
Pinging www.idnet.co.uk [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=62
Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms
;D ;D ;D ;D
danni@Matilda:~$ ping idnet.co.uk -c 4
PING idnet.co.uk (212.69.36.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.idnet.net (212.69.36.10): icmp_seq=1 ttl=62 time=43.6 ms
64 bytes from www.idnet.net (212.69.36.10): icmp_seq=2 ttl=62 time=45.0 ms
64 bytes from www.idnet.net (212.69.36.10): icmp_seq=3 ttl=62 time=43.5 ms
64 bytes from www.idnet.net (212.69.36.10): icmp_seq=4 ttl=62 time=44.4 ms
--- idnet.co.uk ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.541/44.171/45.096/0.637 ms
danni@Matilda:~$
Not bad considering I'm on wireless, and much better than they used to be.
I'm sure if I used the downstairs computer it would be better. I did have some problems viewing websites earlier, but that seems to have resolved itself.
PING 212.69.36.10 (212.69.36.10): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=20.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=20.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=10.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=20.0 ms
--- 212.69.36.10 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 10.0/17.5/20.0 ms
Pinging 212.69.36.10 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=62
Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0%
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 36ms, Maximum = 43ms, Average = 39ms
My pings have also recently jumped up a bit, I'm getting about 40ms to idnet.net now, whereas before I was getting ~20ms. Just wondering here, but perhaps interleaving is ON?
Adam
This is the read out from my router
DSL Status
Connection Status Connected
Upstream Rate (Kbps) 448
Downstream Rate (Kbps) 2720
US Margin 21
DS Margin 0
Modulation MMODE
LOS Errors 0
DS Line Attenuation 52
US Line Attenuation 60
Path Mode Interleaved
ADSL Link Downstream Upstream
Connection Speed 4320 kbps 448 kbps
Line Attenuation 53 db 15.5 db
Noise Margin 7 db 21 db
And still pinging IDNet at 20ms and speed is 3431 kbps
I'm not really bothered either way, I'm just looking for an explanation for the ping rises. :P
Adam
[Edit]: Called and was informed it is off, back on the hunt for the problem. :P
Yeah my pings went up too earlier. A router reboot seemed to fix it. I traced the server where I was playing and I was getting 156ms on the first hop (idnet one).. :)
But look at the last line of Coopes stats ;) Or is each individual different?
Quote from: Bill on Apr 03, 2006, 23:37:09
Pinging www.idnet.co.uk [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=62
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=62
Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms
;D ;D ;D ;D
NICE ;D
now where do i have to move to exactly? ;)
Quotenow where do i have to move to exactly?
Abingdon area of South Oxfordshire, 01235 code. That's as close as I'm saying. ;)
had to be down south tbh! :P
Aye, there`s always a down side :D