Why do some ISPs offer a 20Mbps service on a 21CN connection and others a 24Mbps service? The various number speed checkers come up with the same result.
No idea, although there is a push to make ISP's state the speed in more realistic terms, 20Mbps is far more realistic than 24 I would imagine over 21CN.
I'd actually be very surprised if 20Mbps was realist for the majority of connections. Statistics I've seen in the past suggest there are very few getting above 14Mbps with average user attaining no more than 8Mbps. That was a while ago so things might have improved but not by very much I'd think.
My question was more general. I just wonder why there is a discrepancy in the advertising for what would appear to be an identical 21CN service? I am pretty sure that what comes out of the line is the same. Or put it another way, if I move from IDNet (24Mbps) where I get a connection rate of 17.4Mbps will my connection rate fall on, say, a Zen (20Mbps) service? The IDNet and Zen speed checkers give an identical range of results.
All the services that ISPs offer can technically support 24Mbps. But providers providing up to 20Mb/s second cap it. If you synced at 20Mbps and you upgraded to a 24Mb/s service you would achieve 24Mb/s,
Oddly, when the BT engineer phoned me yesterday morning, he actually referred to 21cn as a 20mb service.
Theoretical max for ADSL2+ is 24 Meg but you'd never get that speed.
If BT themselves refer to it as a 20mb service, it suggests it never could!
24 Meg would require no ATM or TCP/IP header, error correction or control bits which is not possible.
Quote from: Niall on Aug 30, 2011, 15:56:31
If BT themselves refer to it as a 20mb service, it suggests it never could!
Now I am confused. If I have learnt anything from my time on this forum, the max IP is 88.2% of the connection speed. So theoretically, the max IP on a 24Mbps service is 21.2Mbps and 17.64 Mbps on a 24Mbps service. However, if a particular line cannot support either of those 2 IPs, is the difference between 24 and 20 just an academic point.
Honestly, I've had my head battered with ADSL info over the last month, so I'm the last person to ask about anything. I'm just parroting what the engineer said.
I shall now run away, crying, from this thread ;D
Its an academic point as it's unlikely you'll get either 20mb or 24mb unless you live next door to the exchange.
My assumption is that any 20mb service is simply a capped 24mb adsl2+ line as that will be the underlying BT wholesale product.
Quote from: Lance on Aug 30, 2011, 16:14:00
Its an academic point as it's unlikely you'll get either 20mb or 24mb unless you live next door to the exchange.
My assumption is that any 20mb service is simply a capped 24mb adsl2+ line as that will be the underlying BT wholesale product.
I will cut to the chase. I am thinking of moving away from IDNet - either now or when FTTC arrives in my area in 3 months time. I have a short list of 3 ISPs which offer packages - both ADSL2+ and FTTC - which would suit my usage. However, one of the ISPs only offers a 20Mbps ADSL2+ service but has a well-regarded technical support department, and I just want to make sure that I will not get a 16% reduction in my current connection speed if I was to move to them. I suspect not as my present connection rate is only 17.5Mbps.
Edit:
An interesting FAQ which provides the answer to my original question. I will comment no further.
http://www.zen.co.uk/enterprise/broadband/enterprise-broadband/up-to-20mbps-broadband-faqs.aspx
No you won't get a reduction if your sync rate stays as is.
Although profiles exist for greater than 20mbps in reality only a very small proportion would achieve anything greater than 20 so I think it may well be a marketing decision to advertise as upto 20Mbps and cap the maximum download at that level.
Quote from: Steve on Aug 30, 2011, 18:52:08
Although profiles exist for greater than 20mbps in reality only a very small proportion would achieve anything greater than 20 so I think it may well be a marketing decision to advertise as upto 20Mbps and cap the maximum download at that level.
That is not quite how Zen's FAQ reads Steve. There is no capping they are just lowering customer expectation based on ADSL2+ experience and OFCOM's push for more accuracy about expected speeds. It will be interesting to see if other ISPs follow suit.
That's what they have said also in response to questions on their own forum (which is not half as lively as this one)
Better to under promise and over deliver.
I'd still be surprised is the average is anything like 20mb. I would prefer all customers to advertise the package based on a ofcom determined average, along with the max speed for the package.
The theoretical maximum sync speed of ADSL Max is 8Mbps (but you need to be close to the Exchange to achieve that).
The theoretical maximum sync speed of ADSL2+ is 24Mbps (you need to be VERY close to the Exchange to achieve that).
We took the view that it made sense to advertise both services using the same criteria and that the industry-standard advertising for ADSL Max has established that we should therefore use the modulation capability.
My own line at home syncs at 21Mbps. We've seen customer lines connecting at 24Mbps.
Oddly, when I was on the upto 8mb service, I got 7.6, but now I'm on the 21cn I 'only' get 14mb. I thought it'd have been higher, but then again it's not straightforward ratio based is it, it's down to the quality of the line you're on.
Quote from: Simon_idnet on Aug 31, 2011, 04:36:36
We've seen customer lines connecting at 24Mbps.
The customer lived on top of the exchange ;D
Be have a "24Mb" club on their forums and judging by the number of people (along with line stats to back it up) posting in there it makes me laugh when people purport the "myth" that you need to live next door to the exchange in order to achieve such sync speeds.
Granted there's plenty more, lots more infact, that don't achieve anywhere near those speeds but the whole "no-one gets those kind of speeds" is simply misleading.
I've got a mate in London that whilst on Be, had 22mb. That was just before they started having problems though, then he moved out the area. Now he has an awful line, but a tasty missus ;D
Having posed the question and seen Zen's and Simon-IDNet's answers, my connection is clearly trying to make its own point. Having had it disconnected for most of the day because of some ongoing domestic electrical work, on re-connection the CR has reached an all time high of 18Mbps: an increase of 700Kbps. This equates to a 10Mbps increase in 6 months of ADSL2+. I am about 1Km from my exchange and I have not touched a thing in 5 months. I will let you know when I pass 20Mbps ;D
We'll put the flags out. :)
And then pop round with the wire cutters >:D
And crimps... ;D
Euphoria short lived as I had a re-synch at 4.23am today: lost all of 100Kps. :'( The occasional re-synch is a small price to pay when the modem seems happy to chug along at a SNR of 2 for days on end.
Quote from: Simon_idnet on Aug 31, 2011, 04:36:36
The theoretical maximum sync speed of ADSL Max is 8Mbps (but you need to be close to the Exchange to achieve that).
The theoretical maximum sync speed of ADSL2+ is 24Mbps (you need to be VERY close to the Exchange to achieve that).
We took the view that it made sense to advertise both services using the same criteria and that the industry-standard advertising for ADSL Max has established that we should therefore use the modulation capability.
My own line at home syncs at 21Mbps. We've seen customer lines connecting at 24Mbps.
I think I'll move in with Simon. ;D
Quote from: cavillas on Sep 01, 2011, 14:15:32
I think I'll move in with Simon. ;D
Anyone who lives with him may not welcome the idea ;D
Quote from: pctech on Sep 01, 2011, 15:36:33
Anyone who lives with him may not welcome the idea ;D
I didn't realise that such an innocent question would generate so much banter :laugh: Perhaps it is time for a supplementary on DNS (or I could just wait for a quiet day)
Supplementaries are added to your bill on leaving. ;)
Suppositories are taken with you.
Quote from: Ardua on Sep 01, 2011, 16:06:09
I didn't realise that such an innocent question would generate so much banter :laugh: Perhaps it is time for a supplementary on DNS (or I could just wait for a quiet day)
You don't so much start a thread round here but rather you light the blue touchpaper or the fuse if you prefer.
Quote from: Ardua on Sep 01, 2011, 16:06:09
I didn't realise that such an innocent question would generate so much banter :laugh: Perhaps it is time for a supplementary on DNS (or I could just wait for a quiet day)
What's DNS? Is it free and can I eat it? ;D
;D
Quote from: Lance on Aug 30, 2011, 16:14:00
Its an academic point as it's unlikely you'll get either 20mb or 24mb unless you live next door to the exchange.
My assumption is that any 20mb service is simply a capped 24mb adsl2+ line as that will be the underlying BT wholesale product.
Perhaps a business point of capping? A cap of 20mb helps contention ratios and back haul.