Anyone having problems with FF3, patched up to date? After a couple of hours use, I find my install starts to lag when typing, shutting down FF and restarting it clears the problem for a while. Using IE8 and there is no issues. I would suspect a memory leak, not sure how to fix it though.
My memory usage had gone from 40MB to 12MB after an hour, Glenn.
I get a 1 - 2 second delay when typing, which causes me to make even more typing errors than normal. :eek4:
I have noticed it a few times too. Happened on every version of FF that I can remember. I think the only way round it is what you are doing, that is restarting FF. I don't really see it as a problem, more just one of those things.
Quote from: Glenn on Dec 05, 2010, 16:37:09
I get a 1 - 2 second delay when typing, which causes me to make even more typing errors than normal. :eek4:
I've seen that - but the way I type it doesn't count. ;)
Interesting, had this problem also.
Might be worth flagging via BugZilla
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ :whistle:
:nana: ;D
Seamonkey is of course the old Mozilla/Netscape suite.
Hallowed memories. :)
Indeed. But it and FF share the integral parts of the browser engine. SM just runs better as it hasn't got all the bloat.
But you should see its klaxon. :tongue:
My FF is using 335Mb of memory at the moment. :eek4: just going to restart it.
Edit:
Down to 103Mb after restart.
Keep taking the tablets, Rik... ;)
Quote from: Glenn on Dec 05, 2010, 16:28:49
Anyone having problems with FF3, patched up to date? After a couple of hours use, I find my install starts to lag when typing, shutting down FF and restarting it clears the problem for a while. Using IE8 and there is no issues. I would suspect a memory leak, not sure how to fix it though.
Fixed in the update called "Chrome" :whistle:
http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
(They actually tackle memory leaks, amongst others such as sandboxing and plugin crashes)
PS. Might have something to do with how FF caches webpages. It may not be a "bug" but an overzealous feature. Can you lower the memory usage for cache? I suppose it will have the opposite side effect, if less pages are stored in cache then they load slower. What we want is more cache on the HDD and less in the RAM.
There is this F&Q. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Memory_Leak
But it seems to "skirt around" the problem. As said, they see it as a feature, not a bug it seems. :dunno:
All my life, manufacturers have labelled bugs as features. Especially Microsoft - take Vista for example. :evil:
Vista should have been codenamed cockroach ;D
I went for some training to support Vista but did not bother sitting the exam as I kind of knew it was doomed.
Quote from: pctech on Dec 06, 2010, 08:56:08
Vista should have been codenamed cockroach ;D
I went for some training to support Vista but did not bother sitting the exam as I kind of knew it was doomed.
I've done that over health and saftey tests. But only cos I knew the in house software would crash. And I have no coding/software experience. I did have to retake it after all the bugs were fixed. :(
+1 for chrome
switched from FF to chrome after it got slower and slower
now I have a browser which starts when I click it not 5 seconds later!
Quote from: mrapoc on Dec 06, 2010, 21:00:37
+1 for chrome
switched from FF to chrome after it got slower and slower
now I have a browser which starts when I click it not 5 seconds later!
Take a look at ChromePlus.
http://www.chromeplus.org
Same thing but compiled without the tracking and other Google hidden extras. :thumb:
Quote from: 6jb on Dec 07, 2010, 08:25:10
Take a look at ChromePlus.
http://www.chromeplus.org
Same thing but compiled without the tracking and other Google hidden extras. :thumb:
Just downloaded and installed this to try it out but I can't get it to import my FF bookmarks for some reason. :(
Have you closed FF, Ray?
Yes tried that, Glenn, still no luck.
I downloaded Chromeplus and am using it now. It imported my FF addresses OK, but after I got a message to close FF before I proceeded.
Subjectively, it does seem a little bit faster than FF.
Quote from: mrapoc on Dec 06, 2010, 21:00:37
+1 for chrome
switched from FF to chrome after it got slower and slower
now I have a browser which starts when I click it not 5 seconds later!
Chrome, powered by wikileaks ;)
Quote from: Ray on Dec 07, 2010, 09:19:59
Just downloaded and installed this to try it out but I can't get it to import my FF bookmarks for some reason. :(
That's odd Ray. I've installed it on three machines now and it has offered to and imported bookmarks from FF V3.6.12
If you click the little spanner at the top right there is a pull down option for the 'bookmark manager'. If you open that, then under 'organize' on the left hand side there is a option to import bookmarks. See what happens if you browse to your FF profile directory and select the file 'places.sqlite'.
I've just tried that, JB, still no luck, I've also tried installing on another MC and I still can't get it import any FF bookmarks, weird, ???
When you back up your bookmarks in Firefox, try and save them as html files (save them on the desktop, easy to navigate to), a opposed to json files. Then when you import from Chrome, point to the html firefox file. :thumb:
Thanks, Mick, that's the way I've just done it by exporting my FF bookmarks as an html file and them importing into Chromeplus. :thumb:
Good news Ray. :thumb: Computers are the work of the devil. :evil:
They are indeed, Mick, :)
Quote from: Ray on Dec 07, 2010, 14:36:24
I've just done it by exporting my FF bookmarks as an html file and them importing into Chromeplus. :thumb:
Excellent Ray.
Chromeplus doesn't have all the bells and whistles as FF but it loads very quickly and is great on netbooks or older computers. It even has an adblock of sorts.
And especially, unlike Google Chrome, is doesn't call home to pass back your browsing habits :thumb:
Good luck.