IDNetters Forums

Technical News & Discussion => Windows News & Discussion => Topic started by: Baz on Sep 06, 2010, 16:19:17

Title: google
Post by: Baz on Sep 06, 2010, 16:19:17
when I use this I have the settings changed to NOT show suggestions in the search.for some reason its changed itself back to showing suggestions but when I change it again to not show it  will not save my preferences and keeps spewing out suggestions where it thinks i should look


any one else having this.
Title: Re: google
Post by: Rik on Sep 06, 2010, 16:20:51
No, but are you keeping the cookie, Baz?
Title: Re: google
Post by: Baz on Sep 06, 2010, 16:26:05
as far as I know Rik yes.FF is set to clear history when closing but not cookies
Title: Re: google
Post by: Rik on Sep 06, 2010, 16:26:38
No other 'wash' programs in use, Baz?
Title: Re: google
Post by: Baz on Sep 06, 2010, 16:28:00
no but you made me think and ive just killed all my cookies,good idea or not  :dunno:  :) ,  and tried again and it seems to have worked
Title: Re: google
Post by: Rik on Sep 06, 2010, 16:30:52
 :thumb:
Title: Re: google
Post by: Lance on Sep 07, 2010, 11:52:56
Do the suggestions really do any harm though?
Title: Re: google
Post by: Rik on Sep 07, 2010, 11:58:02
Some of the things suggested to me would.  :evil:
Title: Re: google
Post by: Baz on Sep 07, 2010, 14:22:18
  ;D ;D   no Lance they dont I just find them annoying
Title: Re: google
Post by: drummer on Sep 07, 2010, 20:46:27
Same thing happened to me after a Firefox update a few months back and it was because the "Remember search and form history" box had somehow become ticked.

Tools -> Options -> Privacy.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: google
Post by: Inkblot on Sep 09, 2010, 06:29:33
The Google thing is about to get worse - not only suggestions but also results.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11239037

Better not do any searches regarding sexism then....or trying to find out what that small blue bird that sometimes appears in the garden....or indeed the male species of any bird!
Title: Re: google
Post by: DorsetBoy on Sep 09, 2010, 07:45:32
I think Google have shot them selves in the butt with these changes. Their "Filtering" often does NOT filter XXX images and content, inappropriate links,images and adverts are being shown even with "Strict" filter selected, now with instant results as you type children have access to bad content before a parent or teacher can react.

Schools will have to drop Google search, my lads school has only been back 4 days since the holidays and already they are looking at blocking Google from their network.

Alan's example of "tit" as in bird produces ads for sex workers,escorts etc to the right of the results and in images pornographic pictures amongst the searched for content.
Title: Re: google
Post by: Rik on Sep 09, 2010, 08:54:27
I'm liking Google less and less...
Title: Re: google
Post by: Technical Ben on Sep 09, 2010, 21:36:07
Quote from: DorsetBoy on Sep 09, 2010, 07:45:32
I think Google have shot them selves in the butt with these changes. Their "Filtering" often does NOT filter XXX images and content, inappropriate links,images and adverts are being shown even with "Strict" filter selected, now with instant results as you type children have access to bad content before a parent or teacher can react.

Schools will have to drop Google search, my lads school has only been back 4 days since the holidays and already they are looking at blocking Google from their network.

Alan's example of "tit" as in bird produces ads for sex workers,escorts etc to the right of the results and in images pornographic pictures amongst the searched for content.

Hmmm. It's a pity. I specifically dropped Yahoo search for Google back in my school days. Mainly because Google had "descriptions" before the links. Yahoo had some, but were often wrong (people tricked the search bots that yahoo used to no end). I've stuck with google since. But as you said, if it's automatically redirecting you, and incorrectly, it's a problem. I can see it going back really quickly.
Title: Re: google
Post by: Steve on Sep 09, 2010, 21:47:04
I didn't getting anything other feathers with safe search strict on although I appreciate anything less than 'strict' the feathers start to come off.
Title: Re: google
Post by: Technical Ben on Sep 10, 2010, 09:03:12
Quote from: Steve on Sep 09, 2010, 21:47:04
I didn't getting anything other feathers with safe search strict on although I appreciate anything less than 'strict' the feathers start to come off.

Sometimes more than just the feathers!  :eek4:
Title: Re: google
Post by: Rik on Sep 10, 2010, 10:10:13
If you're lucky.  :evil:
Title: Re: google
Post by: Gary on Sep 10, 2010, 12:06:03
Sometimes its amazing what comes up when you google something, things that really really should never be read let alone seen  :eyebrow:
Title: Re: google
Post by: zappaDPJ on Sep 10, 2010, 14:31:18
I'm clearly being robbed. I have SafeSearch off and get the following with Instant (search) turned on...

T - Tesco
TI - Ticketmaster
TIT - Titanic
TITS - Blank page

P - PayPal
PO - Post Office
POR - Portal
PORN - Blank Page

Until I hit return on the full word I just get a blank page returned  :dunno:
Title: Re: google
Post by: Technical Ben on Sep 10, 2010, 14:38:45
Quote from: zappaDPJ on Sep 10, 2010, 14:31:18
I'm clearly being robbed. I have SafeSearch off and get the following with Instant (search) turned on...

T - Tesco
TI - Ticketmaster
TIT - Titanic
TITS - Blank page

P - PayPal
PO - Post Office
POR - Portal
PORN - Blank Page

Until I hit return on the full word I just get a blank page returned  :dunno:

Wow. That's actually good of them to implement a filter. I just commented on how they give wrong results, never got a "dodgy" one myself. Others here on the forum suggested that.  :whistle:
Title: Re: google
Post by: Rik on Sep 10, 2010, 15:50:04
Google, wrong? Next you'll be trying to tell me they want to dominate the world. ;)
Title: Re: google
Post by: Technical Ben on Sep 10, 2010, 18:15:03
No, not untill they develop "Google Nuke".  :eek4:
Title: Re: google
Post by: Rik on Sep 10, 2010, 18:18:26
 ;D