IDNetters Forums

Technical News & Discussion => IDNet Help => Topic started by: neocr0n on Feb 18, 2007, 16:54:42

Title: Latency - Sunday 16:52 18/2/07
Post by: neocr0n on Feb 18, 2007, 16:54:42
Hi just checking in to see if everyone is experiencing some minor latency jumping today, in the region of 60/70ms.

I just got a new router but with IDnets current state its kind of hard to tell if its my router/settings/network or IDnet thats the problem.


Edit: Date added for clarity

Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: Nova on Feb 18, 2007, 17:16:26
Seeing the same here.
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: Nerval on Feb 18, 2007, 17:29:07
From the thread title, I thought that today had been designated "Latency Sunday". :laugh:
And from the performance of my PC, I wouldn't have been surprised.
Yes everything is bad here at the moment.
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: neocr0n on Feb 18, 2007, 17:46:19
Quote from: Nerval on Feb 18, 2007, 17:29:07
From the thread title, I thought that today had been designated "Latency Sunday". :laugh:
And from the performance of my PC, I wouldn't have been surprised.
Yes everything is bad here at the moment.

Haha!, alright guys thanks, just needed to make sure it wasn't all me.
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: Rik on Feb 18, 2007, 17:53:32
Even I'm seeing pings at 2-3x normal, and I don't normally notice. Mind you, as long as I've been on the 'net, Sunday evenings have always shown the worst performance.
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: maxping on Feb 18, 2007, 18:02:32
Higher than normal here but not into the hundreds yet so my fingers are crossed.

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 53ms, Average = 36ms
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: Rik on Feb 18, 2007, 18:38:53
Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 43ms, Maximum = 52ms, Average = 47ms

Though I do have interleaving on.
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: siege2 on Feb 18, 2007, 18:42:06
Pinging www.idnet.co.uk [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 36ms

with a MTU on router off 1400 and PC 1310 "so I can play TA Springs" :-)
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: siege2 on Feb 18, 2007, 18:46:12
also if you are interested  :D

Tracing route to www.idnet.co.uk [212.69.36.10]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2    30 ms    30 ms    30 ms  telehouse-gw-msdp.idnet.net [*.*.*.*]
  3    31 ms    30 ms    30 ms  212.69.63.10
  4    42 ms    32 ms    32 ms  redbus-gw.idnet.net [212.69.63.1]
  5    35 ms    33 ms    31 ms  www.idnet.net [212.69.36.10]

Trace complete.
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: maxping on Feb 18, 2007, 18:57:22
Looking good  ;)


Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 28ms, Average = 26ms
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: siege2 on Feb 18, 2007, 18:59:22
 ;D
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: cavillas on Feb 18, 2007, 19:01:09
Is "latency Sunday" a precursor to Lent, or am I in the wrong forum again.  ;D :out:
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: MoHux on Feb 18, 2007, 19:04:21
Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 19ms

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 18ms

;D
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: maxping on Feb 18, 2007, 19:07:43
Mo i aint even going to try to beat that  :laugh:
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: MoHux on Feb 18, 2007, 19:15:15
 ;)
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: Nova on Feb 19, 2007, 05:44:36
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 17ms, Average = 16ms

-----

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 16ms

Ping faster yo ;-)

Nova
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: maxping on Feb 19, 2007, 18:10:56
Best yet   ;)

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 6ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 7ms
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: Lance on Feb 19, 2007, 18:12:39
 :o right now i want to swear at you max! I'm sooooo jealous!
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: MoHux on Feb 20, 2007, 00:13:52
'ow did 'e do that!!  :o :o
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: siege2 on Feb 20, 2007, 00:33:24
Either got put onto new Pipe FIRST :-) or moved next door or in to IDNET :-)
;D
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: maxping on Feb 20, 2007, 01:04:18
Or i cheated a little   :laugh:

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 1ms
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: neocr0n on Feb 20, 2007, 01:08:17
Cheat! haha
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: maxping on Feb 20, 2007, 01:09:27
 ;)
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: MoHux on Feb 20, 2007, 01:31:36
 ;) ;D
Title: Re: Latency Sunday 16:52
Post by: Rik on Feb 20, 2007, 09:00:17
Now if only we could really adjust our pings so easily...  8)