Taken from a "genuine" 2700 i would sell my children for stats like this. AND NO NO EDIT IN ANY WAY and yes the attenuation is 3.8dB.
guess how close to the exchange i was....come on nearest wins the prize of being a know it all
[attachment deleted by admin]
You were stood next to the DSLAM? :)
I'd go for that too. 3.8dB downstream attenuation is the lowest I've ever seen!
In theory, it's about 350m away from the DSLAM, but with some loss on termination I reckon is has to be in the exchange building, Seb. :)
Both wrong try again
OK, first street cabinet?
wrong. colder and on the info pre-activation bit info said max adsl expected 2.8Mb
OK, you were at home and BT have put in a fibre link to overcome the train problem?
Now that would be cool (and highly unlikely given that it's BT!). :)
I know, but I think this is a trick question. ;D
:hehe:
Well I'm off for dinner. I'll be thinking! :bye:
Me too, I won't. ;D :bye:
What is puzzling me is that if the line was that great, the noise margin and the max rate would be higher. ???
interleaving was on, and we did 20+ connections over a 1 hour period. hence the "low" sync
and no Rik no fibre involved....
Ok cat out of Bag I was literally on top of a major bt exchange, the dslam was "physically" 3/5 metres away (through a major bit of concrete i will add/the roof of the exchange), although cable length was about 100metres (BT guy checked it with his reflectometer kit-more for fun than anything else)
That's cheating. ;D
Quote from: g7pkf on Apr 28, 2009, 08:40:34
(BT guy checked it with his reflectometer kit-more for fun than anything else)
:zip: